it seems some people would like to debate the Dwarf planet rulership question so i thought i'd throw this thread in.
Unfortunately, it seems this debate has already been had some time ago.
http://www.karmastrology.com/cgi-bin/qforum/quaoarbb.cgi?forum_name=main_forum&message_number=323 See? Link!
The symetry of this arrangement is too good for a Libra like myself to discount, and the tidiness of the arrangement is too much for a Virgo rising like myself to ignore.
Well…just how is this arrangement any “better” or “tidier” than any other school of thought? I fail to see this magical symmetry that makes it all make sense. Leo, Cancer, Gemini, Taurus, Aries, Virgo, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, Pisces, Scorpio, Libra seems just as messed up a planet system as any other thought or arrangement.
she was given moo-cow qualities of nurturing, just dripping with estrogen and Lunar/Jupiter stuff. but i'm guessing that there is a bigger list of adjectives to describe her energies that were given to the lesser roids instead.
That’s just how Ceres is. Agriculture and the motherly impulses and harmony with nature is Taurian/Cancerian. That’s just how it goes, it would seem. Ceres, unfortunately, was subjected to the same astrological “tests” as Uranus and the other modern planets. This assumed list of other adjectives may have been created had we not fallen into the "the name makes the astrological influence" mindset. Fortunately, I think we’ve been quite lucky in understanding their energy flows through charts.